16 min read

Positioning and Outlook - 2026-10-17

General & impersonal research commentary. Not investment advice.

Published 2026-10-17

A rules-based model portfolio review flags widening high-yield credit spreads and a jump in the share of companies flagged as financially distressed, against a backdrop of geopolitical tension, elevated Japanese wholesale inflation and an uncertain ECB leadership path.

Recent Events

The past few weeks brought a heavier geopolitical tone, with attacks on shipping ahead of the US vote and Ukraine striking a Russian refinery as Kyiv's energy truce with Washington frayed, while Japan's elevated wholesale inflation kept the BOJ's rate-hike path in view and questions over early ECB leadership weighed on French bonds. Credit conditions gathered more attention than equities: high-yield spreads were widening, and the share of companies flagged in danger rose from the prior week's reading even as the average survival score improved. Corporate news was dominated by a cluster of regulatory filings covering material agreements, exit and disposal costs, impairments and a delisting, alongside the expiry of the CMS telehealth waiver absent a congressional extension. The days ahead hold a light central-bank speaking calendar, with Bowman and Cook on the docket.

Macro & policy
2026-10-14Iran shifting tactics to step up attacks on shipping before US vote, officials say
2026-10-13Japan's wholesale inflation remains elevated, keeps alive BOJ rate-hike view
2026-10-06Early ECB leadership change could worsen Paris bond jolt
2026-10-15Ukraine hits Russian refinery as Zelenskiy says 'we're done' with Trump's energy truce
Credit & corporate
2026-10-15Buybacks: 13373 active, $4438B TTM
2026-10-15Credit survival: avg 48/100, 7732 in danger, Altman basis: 87% measured, 9% model-N/A, 4% data gap
2026-10-15HY OAS Weekly: WIDENING → hold cash
2026-10-08Credit survival: avg 41/100, 9750 in danger
On the calendar
2026-09-30Cook, The Dual Mandate in Rural America
2026-09-29Bowman, Opening Remarks
2026-10-06Bowman, Modernizing the Regulatory and Supervisory Landscape
Notable news
2026-09-308-K Regulation FD Disclosure; Other Events (2026-09-30)
2026-09-308-K Entry into Material Agreement; 1.03; 2.04; Costs for Exit/Disposal; Material Impairments; Delisting/Transfer; Regulation FD Disclosure
2026-09-30Current CMS telehealth waiver expires (if not extended by Congress)

Upcoming Events

The weeks ahead are anchored by a run of central-bank decisions, with the PBOC's Loan Prime Rate fixing opening the sequence before the FOMC, ECB, and Bank of Japan meet on consecutive days in late October. The Bank of England follows in early November, so the concentration of policy meetings compresses the window in which the market can react to each. Around that spine sits a dense earnings stretch of roughly 2,180 scheduled reports, with the nearest batch arriving mid-October, alongside monthly options expiration on 16 October and a pair of bill auctions the following week. A cluster of drug trial readouts and a steady flow of results round out the calendar, making the period crowded rather than quiet.

2026-10-16● Monthly options expiration (OpEx) (US)
2026-10-16● phase2 readout: Glofitamab (RHHBY) (US)
2026-10-16● phase2 readout: Pembrolizumab (MRK) (US)
2026-10-18● phase2 readout: Tarlatamab (AMGN) (US)
2026-10-18● phase3 readout: Farxiga® (dapagliflozin) + Onglyza® (saxagliptin) + Metformin Oral Mix Treat type 2 diabetes (DSGN) (US)
2026-10-19● 13-Week BILL auction (US)
2026-10-19● 26-Week BILL auction (US)
2026-10-20● PBOC Loan Prime Rate (LPR) fixing (CN)
2026-10-28● FOMC monetary policy decision (US)
2026-10-29● ECB Governing Council monetary policy meeting (EZ)
2026-10-30● Bank of Japan Monetary Policy Meeting (JP)
2026-11-05● Bank of England MPC monetary policy decision (UK)
Plus 2180 corporate earnings reports scheduled in the window.

Macro Projections

The next three weeks are unusually catalyst-dense, with the FOMC and ECB both meeting on 10/28 and 10/29, PCE and third-quarter GDP landing 10/29, where the crowd prices GDP above 2% at 0.95 and above 3% at 0.68, and private-credit earnings from BX, ARES and OWL offering a direct test of the credit narrative. The prevailing regime is best described as expensive calm under stress: the US 30-year sits at 5.436%, the 96.5th percentile of its history, but this is not a US-only story, with the JGB 30-year at 4.024% (99.5th percentile), the gilt 10-year at 5.383% (99.8th) and bunds near the 95th, a synchronized global repricing of term premium, the compensation investors demand for holding long-dated debt. Yet every long end rallied this week (30-year down 12.7bp, JGB 10-year down 16.3bp, bund 10-year down 12.9bp) as an AI-linked equity wobble drove flight-to-quality Treasury demand, a classic pause inside an uptrend, corroborated by Reuters and WSJ flow reporting bank trading revenues hit by rate volatility and IPO delays. The carry model puts a disorderly unwind at 39.8%, stepped up from 30.6% a week ago and holding, elevated and sticky rather than accelerating, and the defining tension is between geopolitical reality and the market surface: the geopolitical risk index reads 342 against a mean near 100 and more than double the prior 141.5 print, with Iran/Hormuz kinetic, precision strikes on Gulf infrastructure, a claimed US naval blockade, a major North Korean test and spiking Red Sea insurance rates, yet VIX at 16.46, high-yield spreads at 3.23 (only mildly wider from 3.02) and G7 FX volatility (how much the major-currency exchange rates are swinging) at -0.94 standard deviations below average. Underneath, the tail is being bid, SKEW at 160.45 and VVIX at 109.9, up 25 week-on-week and accelerating, while asset managers sit -2.42z short VIX and +2.74z long the 10-year, a hedged-but-nervous posture where the carry model, positioning and tail metrics agree even as discounted sentiment readings diverge from the rates-and-volatility complex. Roughly 35% odds are placed on the calm-credit regime breaking by mid-January, with high-yield spreads above 3.75% as the lead indicator, and about 30% on a VIX print above 20 within 30 days; the conditional fork runs clearly, if Hormuz transit is materially disrupted or the FOMC surprises hawkish on 10/28, the crowded short-volatility, long-duration book unwinds, MOVE (the rates-market volatility gauge, steady at 101) spikes toward 120 and the bond-volatility-selling edge fires (74% hit rate, n=54); otherwise the muddle-through holds, oil stays bid and credit grinds slowly wider. The priced-versus-unpriced gap matters: Kalshi prices a 2026 recession at just 5% and 2027 at 22%, and a pre-2027 cut at 5.3%, implying the crowd expects a Warsh Fed to hold rates high into a soft landing even as a geopolitical risk index at 342 argues the tail is fatter than 22%. This framing is falsified if high-yield spreads tighten back below 3.00 while the 30-year breaks under 5.20 and the geopolitical risk index falls under 200 by year-end, and the petroleum read, stale as of 2026-10-02 and roughly 15 days old, is discounted accordingly.

Near term ▬●●●  expires Nov 16, 2026
The FOMC holds the federal funds rate unchanged at its 2026-10-28 meeting (no hike, no cut).
Cross-validated across two domains: Kalshi prices an October 0bp outcome at ~0.88 (Williams/Jefferson reset hike odds from ~70% to ~25%) and the Fed-reaction model's hold propensity is 0.778 with intervention propensity stable at 0.264. The muddle-through/status-quo scenario.
Near term ▼●●●  expires Nov 16, 2026
VIX closes at or above 20 at least once within 30 days, despite sitting at 16.46 today.
Volatility complex diverges from the surface: VVIX 109.9 accelerating_positive (+25 in a week), CBOE SKEW 160.45 accelerating_positive (fat left-tail bid), asset managers -2.42z short VIX (crowded), GPR 342 with a kinetic Iran/Hormuz war, and CAPE 41 AI-linked fragility already triggering flight-to-quality flows per the news flow.
Cyclical ▼●●●  expires Jan 15, 2027
HY OAS widens above 3.75% within 90 days (from 3.23% on 2026-10-15).
HY OAS has ground wider from 3.02 to 3.23 over three weeks; the weekly analysis flags WIDENING/hold cash; sentiment's geopolitical layer is BEARISH while credit is BULLISH, a divergence that historically resolves toward credit repricing; GPR 342 and a kinetic Hormuz crisis are not priced into a 3.23% spread. Kernel confirmation score 35/100 HOLD confirms no all-clear.
Cyclical ▬●●●  expires Jan 15, 2027
The UST 30Y yield remains at or above 5.0% through mid-January 2027, the flight-to-quality rally fades and the term-premium regime persists.
The 30Y at 5.436% (96.5th percentile) fell only 12.7bp on the week and remains deep in its extreme zone; the move is globally synchronized (JGB 30Y 4.024% at 99.5th pctl, gilt 10Y 5.383% at 99.8th pctl), i.e., a structural term-premium repricing, not a US data wobble. Carry model tags thirty year breached 530 with disorderly-unwind probability at 39.8% and sticky; asset managers are already +2.74z long the 10Y, limi…
Cyclical ▬●●●  expires Apr 15, 2027
WTI crude remains above $80/bbl on a sustained basis through the 180-day horizon (no return to sub-$80 oil while the Gulf conflict is kinetic).
Kalshi prices WTI above $87.49 and $92.49 near-term at 0.98; the Iran/Hormuz situation is KINETIC with documented strikes on Gulf infrastructure, Houthi Red Sea insurance rates spiking, and the validated hormuz-buffer-ratchet mechanism edge in play. Caveat: EIA inventory data is stale (2026-10-02), so the physical-balancing side is discounted; the claim rests on the geopolitical premium persisting.
Secular ▼●●●  expires Oct 17, 2027
Developed ex-US equities outperform US equities in total-return terms over the next 12 months.
Valuation anchor: US earnings yield 4.13% (CAPE 41, implied 10y real return 2.44%) vs developed ex-US 5.82% and EM 6.98%, a 1.7-2.9pt yield gap; a Warsh-led higher-for-longer Fed (pre-2027 cut priced at only 5.3%) compresses the US concentration premium, and the china-ai-narrative-threat mechanism edge plus AI-linked equity wobble already visible in the news flow threaten the US growth complex specifically. Low conf…

Positioning

Position weights scale to conviction, and conviction here is the screening-kernel composite, a modelled blend of expected upside drift against drawdown probability, so the highest-scoring names earn the largest equity weights while low-conviction names stay small. That calibration sits against an elevated credit regime, with high-yield spreads near 3.23%. Beneath the scoring, several documented structural channels adjust the sizing, each carried with its historical base rate across prior firings and discounted for what the market already prices, weighable inputs rather than predictions. The holdings and the reasoning behind every weight follow in the model-portfolio table.

NameConviction scoreModelled drift
CCJ
2.17
+0.9%
NTR
1.81
+3.1%
CF
1.27
-0.9%
LDOS
1.08
-4.2%
VLO
1.02
-2.8%
NXE
0.74
+0.3%
op:china-ai-narrative-threat-v2 → the affected asset ▲ · 100% base rate · n=1op:hormuz-buffer-ratchet-v2 → the affected asset ▲ · 100% base rate · n=1op:trump-policy-reaction-function-v1 → the affected asset ▲ · 100% base rate · n=1

Model Portfolio

The model portfolio keeps a meaningful slice in cash as dry powder while the bulk of capital stays deployed across a few clearly defined sleeves. Two of those sleeves, inflation-linked Treasuries held through both short and longer-duration vehicles, are structural positions built around a real-yield thesis rather than tactical trades. Alongside them sits a global quality equity sleeve, tilted toward the AI capex cycle, and a single-name energy holding whose case rests on tight refinery capacity and wide margins.

Inflation-linked 35.0%Other 27.9%Equity 17.5%Gold & metals 11.6%Cash 8.1%
NameWeightThesis
Equity · 17.5%
QUAL
17.5%
global quality equity
Inflation-linked · 35.0%
SCHP
16.8%
inflation-linked Treasuries
VTIP
10.4%
inflation-linked Treasuries
LTPZ
7.8%
inflation-linked Treasuries
Other · 27.9%
VLO
11.2%
passthrough
KMI
3.7%
passthrough
LDOS
2.0%
critical materials defense
CCJ
1.8%
critical materials defense
FCX
1.8%
critical materials defense
SCCO
1.7%
critical materials defense
NXE
1.0%
critical materials defense
LIT
0.9%
critical materials defense
COPX
0.8%
critical materials defense
URA
0.6%
critical materials defense
URNM
0.4%
critical materials defense
WMB
0.4%
passthrough
NTR
0.3%
critical materials defense
MP
0.3%
critical materials defense
CF
0.3%
critical materials defense
MOS
0.2%
critical materials defense
SQM
0.2%
critical materials defense
ICL
0.1%
critical materials defense
ET
0.0%
passthrough
Cash · 8.1%
Money Market
8.1%
money-market / cash
Gold & metals · 11.6%
IAU
7.8%
gold / precious-metals
GDX
3.5%
gold / precious-metals
SLV
0.3%
gold / precious-metals
Position notes
VLO 11.2%
Full research note
the model's cross-asset allocation posture candidate (R3 screen 2026-10-17). RS rank vs SPY: 98.5. Stage 2. Sub-industry RS rank: —. 12m return: 176.3%. Quality pass: net margin 5.2%, D/E 0.45.
Bull case · The global refinery capacity shortage, exacerbated by under‑investment and geopolitical supply chain disruptions (Hormuz, Bab al‑Mandeb), supports historically wide gross margins and strong FCF. Valero’s low leverage, net cash position, and shareholder returns (buybacks) amplify upside; near‑term momentum is strong (close +53% over 3 months) and the 3m model expected upside is 12%.
Bear case · Refining margins are inherently cyclical; a macroeconomic slowdown or recession would crush demand for refined products, quickly compressing margins back to breakeven. Rising regulatory costs from the Renewable Fuel Standard and potential carbon mandates permanently erode profitability, while the long‑term energy transition threat (EV adoption) caps terminal value.
Key risks
• Crack spread compression from recession or global supply response
• Regulatory burden (RFS, carbon taxes) raising operating costs
• Crude oil price shock (e.g. Hormuz re‑closure) harming product demand
• Energy transition structurally reducing gasoline/refining demand beyond 2030s
• Elevated geopolitical risk premium fading if Iran tensions ease
KMI 3.7%
Full research note
Oil and gas pipeline and terminal operator facing reserve depletion and energy transition risks.
LDOS 2.0%
Full research note
Leidos provides IT, engineering, and cybersecurity services primarily to U.S. government agencies.
CCJ 1.8%
Full research note
Cameco is a uranium producer and nuclear fuel services provider for global utilities.
Bull case · The strongest bull case hinges on the accelerating AI data center power buildout and Cameco's strategic downstream integration. Recent catalysts include Cameco's June 2026 move to increase its stake in the tier-one Cigar Lake mine to 57.4%, alongside Westinghouse (49% owned by Cameco) securing a central role in an $80 billion U.S. government partnership to deploy AP1000 reactors. Analysts are reiterating buys on the recent dip, citing long-term uranium contract prices hitting $90/lb in Q1 2026—the highest level since 2008—which structurally insulates the company from spot market volatility.
Bear case · The bear case focuses on severe valuation overhang and near-term execution friction. Trading at over 90x trailing earnings, the stock is highly vulnerable to multiple compression if uranium spot prices stall or if AI capex digestion delays actual reactor deployments. Furthermore, recent supply chain disruptions—such as the May 2026 bridge collapse in northern Saskatchewan that temporarily halted Key Lake and McArthur River supply lines—highlight the operational fragility of remote mining assets.
Key risks
• Severe valuation overhang leaving no margin of safety if uranium prices plateau or hyperscaler nuclear timelines slip.
• Operational and supply chain disruptions at key Saskatchewan mines, as evidenced by recent infrastructure washouts.
• AI data center capex digestion in the 2026–2027 window delaying the deployment of SMRs and new reactor builds.
• Geopolitical shifts that could unexpectedly reintroduce sanctioned Russian or Kazakh supply to Western markets, cooling the "security premium."
FCX 1.8%
Full research note
the model's cross-asset allocation posture candidate (R3 screen 2026-10-10). RS rank vs SPY: 92.4. Stage 2. Sub-industry RS rank: —. 12m return: 72.0%. Quality pass: net margin 11.4%, D/E 0.52.
SCCO 1.7%
Full research note
the model's cross-asset allocation posture candidate (R3 screen 2026-10-10). RS rank vs SPY: 91.2. Stage 2. Sub-industry RS rank: —. 12m return: 63.9%. Quality pass: net margin 35.9%, D/E 0.68.
Bull case · Structural copper demand from electrification, renewable energy, and AI data centers supports long-term price appreciation; SCCO's industry-leading margins (gross margin ~59%, operating margin ~58%) and low cash costs provide a wide moat; the Tía María project and strong free cash flow generation (FCF margin ~29%) offer additional upside if copper prices remain elevated and the US-Iran peace deal temporarily eases inflation fears, potentially lowering the dollar.
Bear case · The stock trades at a significant premium to its sector (P/E 29.2 vs. peer median 26.1; P/B 12.3 vs. 2.2) with a consensus analyst target ~15% below current price and a majority of sell/underperform ratings; a potential copper demand slowdown from China's economic struggles or renewed trade war escalation, combined with a hawkish Fed holding rates high for longer, could compress multiples and trigger a sharp correction. Additionally, the recent Iran peace deal may reduce the 'safe-haven' premium that had supported commodity currencies and metals.
Key risks
• Severe valuation overhang: SCCO is priced for perfection, leaving no margin of safety if copper prices retreat or costs rise.
• Geopolitical and regulatory risks in Peru, including potential mining tax overhauls and anti-mining protests that could disrupt operations.
• Macro sensitivity to a strong US dollar (the DXY remains elevated) and a potential Chinese economic slowdown, both of which would directly pressure copper prices.
• Execution risk at Tía María, a greenfield project with a history of community opposition; delays or cost overruns could erode returns.
• Elevated short interest (12.1% of float, 9.0 days to cover) signals significant bearish sentiment, increasing vulnerability to a downside catalyst-driven squeeze rather than an upside one.
NXE 1.0%
Full research note
NexGen Energy develops uranium properties in Canada, primarily the Rook I project.
WMB 0.4%
Full research note
Natural gas pipeline and midstream infrastructure company with regulated assets and recurring fee-based revenue.
NTR 0.3%
Full research note
Nutrien supplies potash and crop nutrients globally through ~2k retail locations, sensitive to price and geopolitical risk.
MP 0.3%
Full research note
Rare earth miner with single facility, subject to commodity price and regulatory risks.
SLV 0.3%
Full research note
Trust holding physical silver to reflect silver price performance.
Bull case · The strongest bullish sentiment anchors on the unprecedented industrial demand wave from AI infrastructure and newer TOPCon solar panels, which are structurally increasing silver intensity per unit. Proponents argue that with mine production severely constrained and consecutive years of global supply deficits, the current macro-driven selloff offers a generational entry point before physical shortages force a violent repricing.
Bear case · Bears point to the immediate macroeconomic reality: a structurally higher US dollar and elevated real yields under a hawkish Fed are crushing the monetary premium of precious metals. This has triggered massive volatility and forced liquidations, with the "safe haven" narrative unwinding rapidly amid potential Middle East de-escalation, leaving silver vulnerable to further downside if industrial demand softens in a recession.
Key risks
• Sustained hawkishness from the Federal Reserve driving real yields higher and accelerating ETF redemptions.
• A durable resolution to the Iran-Hormuz conflict draining the geopolitical safe-haven premium from precious metals.
• Technological substitution or "thrifting" in solar panel manufacturing reducing the silver intensity per cell.
• Intense fee competition from lower-cost physical silver ETFs eroding SLV's market share among retail investors.
CF 0.3%
Full research note
CF Industries manufactures nitrogen fertilizers and industrial products in a commodity market with cyclical oversupply.
Bull case · The strongest bull case rests on a "tighter for longer" nitrogen market combined with sharply bullish analyst revision flow. With Middle Eastern supply offline and European natural gas prices spiking, CF's North American cost advantage is generating massive free cash flow. This dynamic has triggered a powerful R19-T10 bullish revision-momentum signal, with consensus FY2026 EPS estimates surging over 70% in the last 60 days, while the Trump administration's recent permitting boost for CF's Blue Point low-carbon ammonia project adds a durable clean-energy growth vector.
Bear case · The bear case argues that CF's recent 50%+ YTD rally has fully priced in the geopolitical premium, leaving the stock highly vulnerable to a sudden de-escalation in the Middle East. If the Strait of Hormuz reopens and Middle Eastern capacity floods back into the market, global nitrogen prices will crater, rapidly compressing CF's currently inflated margins and triggering a cyclical mean-reversion selloff.
Key risks
• Geopolitical de-escalation in the Middle East rapidly normalizing global nitrogen supply.
• Cyclical mean-reversion risk following a massive 50%+ YTD rally.
• Volatility in North American natural gas prices eroding the company's structural cost advantage.
• Potential operational fatigue or unplanned outages after delaying critical maintenance at the Donaldsonville complex.
MOS 0.2%
Full research note
The Mosaic Company is a producer of phosphate and potash crop nutrients for global agriculture.
SQM 0.2%
Full research note
SQM is a global specialty chemicals and lithium producer with a high concentration of revenue from a single joint venture in Chile's Salar de Atacama.
ICL 0.1%
Full research note
Global specialty minerals and chemicals company extracting potash and phosphate.
ET 0.0%
Full research note
Energy infrastructure company with regulated pipelines, storage, and midstream operations, stable cash flows.

Track Record

Since the model portfolio's inception on 21 August 2026, it has returned -5.98% against -0.99% for a daily-rebalanced 60/40 SPY/AGG benchmark, a relative shortfall of roughly five percentage points over 40 trading days. Per-pick alpha across the 57 days of evaluated ideas has also been negative at each matured horizon, the hit rate falls and mean alpha widens as the window lengthens, from a 42% hit rate and -0.4% mean alpha at one day to a 10% hit rate and -5.4% mean alpha at four weeks, though the sample thins sharply with horizon, with just 67 ideas reaching the four-week mark and the first three-month outcomes not due until around 20 November 2026. Each recommendation is written down before the outcome is known and scored when its horizon arrives, including the results above, which do not flatter the system. These are hypothetical model results, not an individual account return, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

-5.98%
Model portfolio return
since 2026-08-21, vs 60/40 (SPY/AGG, daily-rebalanced) -0.99%
10%
Per-pick hit rate
4w, n=67
-5.4%
Mean alpha (4w)
-3.5%
Mean return (4w)

Macro forecasts: 353 graded, 1257 open — each call is scored against what actually happened when its horizon arrived.

Positions, conflicts & disclosures

DISCLAIMER — NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE (DECISION-LINKED)

This publication provides GENERAL and IMPERSONAL commentary and analysis on a regular schedule. The same content is provided to every subscriber. It is NOT investment advice, is NOT tailored to any individual, and does NOT account for your personal financial situation, objectives, or risk tolerance.

This post reports (1) a rules-based MODEL portfolio — target weights produced by an automated system's published rules, identical for all readers — and (2) DECISION-LINKED activity: how that affiliated automated system actually implemented, or has queued to implement, those rules in accounts belonging to the publication's operator. Model weights are not an account statement; the decision-linked positions and pending orders are REAL and belong to accounts affiliated with this publication's operator. We publish them for transparency on a fixed schedule under our Trading & Publication Policy [link] — not as a recommendation that any security or strategy is suitable for you. Because the publisher and/or operator hold or intend to establish positions in the securities discussed, a conflict of interest exists and our interests may differ from yours.

Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security for you specifically. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance — model or actual — does not guarantee future results.

[Publisher LLC] is not a registered investment adviser and does not provide individualized investment advice. Consult a licensed professional before making any investment decision. See full disclosures, methodology, and our Trading & Publication Policy at [link].

POSITIONS DISCLOSURE: this is a hypothetical, rules-based model portfolio, not a statement of any individual's actual account; the publisher and/or author may hold positions in one or more of the securities listed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: because the publisher and/or author may hold listed securities, a conflict of interest exists and could benefit from price movements; the publisher receives no compensation for featuring any security, and this impersonal model illustration is not personalized investment advice or a solicitation to transact.

MICRO-CAP CAVEAT: some listed names are micro-capitalization securities held at small model weights; micro-caps carry elevated liquidity and volatility risk and are unsuitable for short-term trading — the small weights reflect that risk, and nothing here is a recommendation to scalp or rapidly trade thinly-traded securities.

Positions held: the publisher and/or operator currently holds positions in the following securities discussed here: CCJ, CF, COPX, ET, FCX, GDX, IAU, ICL, KMI, LDOS, LIT, LTPZ, MOS, MP, NTR, NXE, QUAL, SCCO, SCHP, SLV, SQM, URA, URNM, VLO, VTIP, WMB.

Disclaimer — not investment advice

This publication is a bona fide financial publication of general and regular circulation. It provides GENERAL and IMPERSONAL commentary and analysis only. The same content is provided to every reader on a regular schedule. It is NOT investment advice, is NOT tailored to any individual, and does NOT account for your personal financial situation, objectives, or risk tolerance.

Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security for you specifically. Any model portfolio described is a rules-based, hypothetical illustration provided to all readers identically — it is not a recommendation personalized to you. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance — and any hypothetical or backtested performance — does not guarantee future results.

Clarke Envoy is not a registered investment adviser and does not provide individualized investment advice. Consult a licensed professional before making any investment decision.